Topic summary
⁠39%5 analyzed articles/videos884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Foreign Aid results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,551 hits. Analysis detected 15,207 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,360 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,747 of 16,491 topics). This US Foreign Aid is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
US Foreign Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 12,360
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos