Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Economic Policy results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 42.3% saturation with 1,065 hits. Analysis detected 6,404 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,517 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,526 of 16,562 topics). This Us Economic Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Us Economic Policy
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,517
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510090.8% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 30.7%30.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 42.3%42.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 21.5%21.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 21.4%21.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 10.4%10.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 42.3%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 30.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 4.0%Horn Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos