Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theodore R. Malloch results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 2,444 hits . Analysis detected 22,486 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,557 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of 92% (539 of 6,628 authors). This Theodore R. Malloch is worse (more manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Theodore R. Malloch
Author details
Total words: 7,557
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.9% percentile 7.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 32.3% 32.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 24.7% 24.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 17.8% 17.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 20.4% 20.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 27.9% 27.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 12.7% 12.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Confirmation Bias: Author 32.3%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect: Author 30.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 27.9%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 24.7%, sitewide 6.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 20.4%, sitewide 6.7% Begging the Question: Author 17.8%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 15.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 8.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Horn Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst