Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video79 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Dollar results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 58.2% saturation with 184 hits. Analysis detected 680 faulty-reasoning hits from 316 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (254 of 16,562 topics). This Us Dollar is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Us Dollar
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 316
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.5% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles316 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 58.2%58.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 50.3%50.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 20.6%20.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 18.0%18.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.9%7.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 9.5%9.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 7.3%7.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.1%22.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 58.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 50.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 20.6%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Recency Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.9%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos