Topic summary
ā 0%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US China Summit results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 70.7% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ā 98% (355 of 16,562 topics). This US China Summit is worse (more manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group.
US China Summit
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Uber1%
ā 0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
ā 0%Opera1%
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Privacy Policy1%
ā 98%US China Summit (selected)18%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 516
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510097.9% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles516 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 52.9%52.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 70.7%70.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 28.9%28.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 20.4%20.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.4%13.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 70.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 52.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 15.7%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos