Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Us Airstrikes results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 235 hits. Analysis detected 1,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (5,769 of 16,562 topics). This Us Airstrikes is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Us Airstrikes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,936
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.1%12.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos