Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Politics results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 673 hits. Analysis detected 2,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,887 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,181 of 15,769 topics). This Urban Politics is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group.
Urban Politics
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,887
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos