Topic summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video480 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Litter results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 227 hits. Analysis detected 1,915 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (4,178 of 15,753 topics). This Urban Litter is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Urban Litter
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠74%Urban Litter (selected)5%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,440
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510073.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 14.7%14.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.7%12.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.6%5.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 15.8%15.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 2.7%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos