Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video704 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Interventions results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 517 hits. Analysis detected 2,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ⁠68% (5,430 of 16,562 topics). This Urban Interventions is worse (more manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group.
Urban Interventions
Topic details
Total words: 2,112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

67% percentile
025507510067.2% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.5%24.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.5%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos