Topic summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Urban Art results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 1,041 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,200 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (19,878 of 23,166 topics). This Urban Art is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Urban Art
Topic details
Total words: 4,200
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst