Topic summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos531 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 3,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,723 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,243 of 16,562 topics). This Unmanned Aerial Vehicles is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Topic details
Total words: 3,723
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 11.8%11.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos