Topic summary
⁠58%1 analyzed article/video406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unlv Rebels Football results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anchoring Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 982 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,213 of 16,562 topics). This Unlv Rebels Football is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group.
Unlv Rebels Football
Topic details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510062.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.8%19.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos