Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Radicalization results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.9% saturation with 957 hits. Analysis detected 6,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,181 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (1,984 of 15,753 topics). This University Radicalization is worse (more manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
University Radicalization
Topic details
Total words: 2,181
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

87% percentile
025507510087.4% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 43.9%43.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 34.8%34.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 24.8%24.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 21.1%21.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 19.4%19.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.5%10.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.8%11.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 43.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 24.8%, sitewide 3.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 23.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Red Herring: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.7%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos