Topic summary
⁠9%1 analyzed article/video828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Louisiana At Lafayette results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,170 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,913 of 16,562 topics). This University Of Louisiana At Lafayette is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
University Of Louisiana At Lafayette
Topic details
Total words: 2,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos