Topic summary
⁠89%2 analyzed articles/videos1,660 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Universal Basic Income results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 608 hits. Analysis detected 7,579 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,675 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (8,993 of 16,562 topics). This Universal Basic Income is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group.
Universal Basic Income
Topic details
Total words: 6,675
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

46% percentile
025507510045.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos