Topic summary
⁠46%2 analyzed articles/videos809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,427 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,570 of 16,562 topics). This United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit
Topic details
Total words: 2,427
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 5.6%5.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.1%Horn Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos