Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unique Businesses results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,167 hits. Analysis detected 5,350 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,876 of 16,562 topics). This Unique Businesses is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Unique Businesses
Topic details
Total words: 5,856
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.9%19.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.0%10.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos