Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unexplained Phenomena results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 647 hits. Analysis detected 4,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,583 of 15,447 topics). This Unexplained Phenomena is better (less manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Unexplained Phenomena
Topic details
Total words: 4,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.0%0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos