Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Underclass results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 1,347 hits. Analysis detected 8,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Underclass is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Underclass
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 13,632
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos