Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ultramarathon Running results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 570 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,113 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,522 of 16,562 topics). This Ultramarathon Running is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Ultramarathon Running
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠55%Ultramarathon Running (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 1,113
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.3%2.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos