Topic summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ulcerative Colitis results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 316 hits . Analysis detected 2,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,168 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (16,082 of 16,562 topics). This Ulcerative Colitis is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Ulcerative Colitis
Topic details
Total words: 6,168
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst