Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ukraine Invasion — Explained results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, In-Group Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 213 hits. Analysis detected 2,549 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (11,861 of 16,562 topics). This Ukraine Invasion — Explained is better (less manipulative) than 71.60% of the peer group.
Ukraine Invasion — Explained
Topic details
Total words: 3,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos