Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S War In Iran results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,316 hits. Analysis detected 10,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,680 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (7,118 of 16,562 topics). This U S War In Iran is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
U S War In Iran
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,680
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 13.3%13.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos