Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Vatican Relations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 3,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (10,668 of 16,562 topics). This U S Vatican Relations is better (less manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
U S Vatican Relations
Topic details
Total words: 3,992
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510035.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.0%0.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos