Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Sports results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 635 hits. Analysis detected 3,410 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,688 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,549 of 16,562 topics). This U S Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
U S Sports
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,688
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510072.5% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.5%6.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Topic 5.8%5.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.3%10.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 0.6%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos