Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Presidency results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 627 hits. Analysis detected 4,468 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (12,013 of 15,330 topics). This U S Presidency is better (less manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
U S Presidency
Topic details
Total words: 6,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510021.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos