Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S National Security And Tech Policy results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 3,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,163 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,537 of 16,562 topics). This U S National Security And Tech Policy is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
U S National Security And Tech Policy
Topic details
Total words: 2,163
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
6.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 19.3%19.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.6%10.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 8.0%8.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 30.2%30.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 14.1%14.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 6.9%Begging the Question: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos