Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S National Security Agency results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.6% saturation with 135 hits. Analysis detected 624 faulty-reasoning hits from 272 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (269 of 15,346 topics). This U S National Security Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 98.30% of the peer group.
U S National Security Agency
Topic details
Total words: 272
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

98% percentile
025507510098.3% percentile
19.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles272 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 25.7%25.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 29.8%29.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 49.6%49.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 36.8%36.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 16.9%16.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 12.9%12.9%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.5%8.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 8.5%8.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 49.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 36.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 29.8%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 12.9%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos