Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Japan Relations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Biased Writer Voice , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 208 hits . Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,626 of 15,769 topics). This U S Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group. U S Japan Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst