Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Japan Relations results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 208 hits. Analysis detected 1,391 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,056 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,626 of 15,769 topics). This U S Japan Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
U S Japan Relations
Topic details
Total words: 2,056
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
3.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 6.0%6.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate