Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s. Foreign Aid results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 1,755 hits. Analysis detected 11,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,178 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,633 of 16,562 topics). This U.s. Foreign Aid is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group.
U.s. Foreign Aid
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,178
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.0% percentile
3.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.9%8.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 4.9%4.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos