Topic summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S China Relations results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 1,815 hits . Analysis detected 17,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,319 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 36% (10,607 of 16,562 topics). This U S China Relations is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. U S China Relations
Topic details
Total words: 15,319
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst