Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kenin M. Spivak results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 40.6% saturation with 698 hits . Analysis detected 5,148 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.6% and a BS Rank of 97% (197 of 6,628 authors). This Kenin M. Spivak is worse (more manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Kenin M. Spivak
Author details
Total words: 1,720
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.0% percentile 13.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 40.6% 40.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 28.6% 28.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 22.9% 22.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 37.9% 37.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 20.4% 20.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.1% 22.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 14.6% 14.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 38.4% 38.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Ad Hominem: Author 40.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Author 38.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 37.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 28.6%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 22.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.1%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Begging the Question: Author 14.6%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Genetic Fallacy: Author 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Author 10.0%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Horn Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 1.0% Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst