Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Typhoons results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 3,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,040 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,546 of 15,447 topics). This Typhoons is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Typhoons
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,040
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos