Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Type 2 Diabetes results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 1,855 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,829 of 15,765 topics). This Type 2 Diabetes is better (less manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Type 2 Diabetes
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.5%6.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos