Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tuition results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 1,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,224 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (2,589 of 16,562 topics). This Tuition is worse (more manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.
Tuition
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,224
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

84% percentile
025507510084.4% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 22.2%22.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 11.8%11.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.3%14.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.4%7.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 7.4%7.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.1%22.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 22.2%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos