Topic summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tsmc Chip Costs results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Bandwagon, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 1,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,167 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,274 of 16,562 topics). This Tsmc Chip Costs is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Tsmc Chip Costs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,167
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
5.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 21.9%21.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 11.5%11.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 11.5%11.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 9.7%9.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.7%10.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos