Topic summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video1,548 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump's Immigration Agenda results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 8,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,658 of 16,562 topics). This Trump's Immigration Agenda is worse (more manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group.
Trump's Immigration Agenda
Topic details
Total words: 6,192
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.8% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 9.2%9.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos