Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 621 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trump Presidency results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 815 hits . Analysis detected 6,523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,863 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,363 of 16,562 topics). This Trump Presidency is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group. Trump Presidency
Topic details
Total words: 1,863
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.8% percentile 9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 43.8% 43.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 21.3% 21.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 25.7% 25.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 16.2% 16.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 19.5% 19.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Topic 12.4% 12.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 14.9% 14.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 13.4% 13.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 36.7% 36.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 43.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 36.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 25.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 21.3%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 7.5% Horn Effect: Topic 16.2%, sitewide 1.0% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 14.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 13.4%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst