Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,143 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ryan Teague Beckwith results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.5% saturation with 2,742 hits . Analysis detected 21,071 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,341 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,442 of 6,277 authors). This Ryan Teague Beckwith is worse (more manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Ryan Teague Beckwith
Author details
Total words: 10,341
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.0% percentile 4.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 26.5% 26.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.7% 12.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.1% 7.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 26.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.9%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst