Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trilateral Cooperation results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 48.8% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 1,204 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (502 of 15,753 topics). This Trilateral Cooperation is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Trilateral Cooperation
Topic details
Total words: 488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
15.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles488 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 30.9%30.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 48.8%48.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 21.5%21.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Topic 16.0%16.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 16.0%16.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 19.5%19.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.2%9.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 48.8%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 30.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 19.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 17.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.2%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos