Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trevor Bauer results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 626 hits. Analysis detected 3,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (6,844 of 15,492 topics). This Trevor Bauer is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Trevor Bauer
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510055.8% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 18.1%18.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.7%11.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 12.3%12.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos