OutKick88%

After no-hitter, Trevor Bauer says media pushed an old ‘bad teammate’ narrative 70%

By Dan Zaksheske0%

4/29/2026, 10:07:35 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,657 faulty-reasoning hits from 864 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 63% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,293 of 20,517 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the article peer group.

Trevor Bauer says even a no-hitter wasn't enough to stop the media from trying to turn the story negative. 
The former Cy Young Award winner joined "Don’t @ Me with Dan Dakich" on Tuesday and ripped what he described as a long-running media effort to paint him as a bad teammate, arguing that the same narrative popped up again even after one of the best outings of his comeback. 
As Fox News Digital’s Scott Thompson reported, Bauer threw a seven-inning no-hitter for the Atlantic League's Long Island Ducks in a 13-0 win over the Lancaster Stormers on Sunday at Penn Medicine Park. 
It was just Bauer’s second start in the United States since 2021, and he walked one and struck out seven in a scheduled seven-inning game, as part of a doubleheader, against the Stormers. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
But Bauer told Dakich the coverage around him rarely stays about baseball for very long. 
"It doesn’t matter what I do," Bauer said. 
"It is going to be twisted negatively in some way and if they can’t twist it negatively, they’re just not going to talk about it or report it." 
Bauer said that has been true for years, especially when it comes to how his relationships with teammates are discussed. 
"I have this rep for being a bad teammate because of a story that came out in 2011 that wasn’t even true," Bauer said. 
"And so that’s followed me my entire career." 
Bauer did not specify which 2011 story he was referring to. 
But the "bad teammate" theme has surfaced in prior coverage, including 2013 reporting that cited criticism from then-Arizona catcher Miguel Montero about working with Bauer during their time in the organization. 
According to Bauer, that same theme showed up again after his no-hitter on Sunday. 
"So much so that when I threw the no-hitter, my infielders celebrated with each other," Bauer said. 
"The story that some people are trying to push is that they didn’t even want to celebrate with me, that I’m such a bad teammate that they don’t want to celebrate with me, despite all the evidence." 
Bauer then pointed to what happened next as proof that the full story looked very different. 
"My teammates circled around me and dunked me with a Gatorade shower," Bauer said. 
"They all went and signed a ball from the no-hitter, which is really cool of them. 
Everyone on the team signed it." 
ZERO BS. 
JUST DAKICH. 
TAKE THE DON'T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. 
DOWNLOAD NOW! 
To that point, USA Today posted a story about the no-hitter with the headline, "Trevor Bauer's Ducks teammates were hilariously unimpressed with no-hitter." 
Yahoo Sports has an article on its website titled, "Trevor Bauer's extremely fake no-hitter won't have MLB teams knocking on his door." 
That was part of a broader frustration Bauer expressed with how he believes stories about him are covered in general. 
"There’s very few articles that ever get everything right," Bauer said. 
"I would say the majority of the time, a lot of it is omission too. 
They know something to be true and they just omit certain facts." 
Bauer argued that some of the most important context is regularly left out. 
"One of the worst ones is like, ‘Oh, he settled with his accuser out of court,’ and they leave it there," Bauer said. 
"Never mentioning that I never paid her a cent and she owes me hundreds of thousands of dollars. 
Like that puts a different context on settling something out of court." 
He added, "They also never mention that I was never charged or never arrested." 
LA COURT AWARDS TREVOR BAUER $310K FROM LINDSEY HILL, WHO ACCUSED MLB PITCHER OF SEXUAL ASSAULT 
From Bauer’s point of view, that is not accidental. 
"I think a lot of the articles are intended to be slanted a certain way," Bauer said. 
"They’re purposely inflammatory from a headline perspective to try to get clicks and then they don’t really reflect the situation accurately on purpose." 
Bauer also acknowledged to Dakich that he has long been a polarizing figure, and he did not pretend that all of that happened by accident. 
"I’m just polarizing in some ways," Bauer said. 
"A lot of it’s been intentional to try to draw attention to the sport of baseball and to try to market it and get more eyeballs on it." 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE FROM OUTKICK 
He added that part of generating attention is understanding what kind of personality gets people talking. 
"I think for something to be interesting, you really need to have like a villain in a lot of ways," Bauer said. 
"And I have no problem playing that role." 
Still, Bauer made clear there is a difference between being polarizing and being falsely framed. 
And after throwing a no-hitter, he clearly believes the attention should have stayed on the performance itself instead of immediately circling back to a narrative he says has followed him for at least 15 years. 
Even when the result is undeniable, he says the story around him is already being written. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 24.4%Dan Zaksheske: 6.1%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias24.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Dan Zaksheske: 2.0%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 2.2%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 13.0%Dan Zaksheske: 8.6%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect13.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Dan Zaksheske: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Dan Zaksheske: 0.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.9%This article: 8.4%Dan Zaksheske: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias8.4%This article: 24.2%Dan Zaksheske: 7.8%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias24.2%This article: 11.7%Dan Zaksheske: 2.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias11.7%This article: 4.3%Dan Zaksheske: 3.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Dan Zaksheske: 3.4%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect2.5%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.4%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 5.7%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 4.3%Dan Zaksheske: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man4.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 3.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 5.0%Dan Zaksheske: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma5.0%This article: 2.7%Dan Zaksheske: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.4%Dan Zaksheske: 7.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization19.4%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.2%Dan Zaksheske: 4.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.2%This article: 4.3%Dan Zaksheske: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 8.9%Dan Zaksheske: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.9%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.3%Dan Zaksheske: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof8.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.6%Dan Zaksheske: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal14.6%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.3%Dan Zaksheske: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.3%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.8%Dan Zaksheske: 2.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote2.8%This article: 3.8%Dan Zaksheske: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection3.8%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 18.2%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Dan Zaksheske: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Dan Zaksheske: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.1%

864 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers70%attributed speech255writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 0.0% coverageScott Thompson • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 8 words • 100.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageUSA Today • 23 words • 0.0% coverageYahoo Sports • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 13 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 18 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 9 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 17 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 16 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 22 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 8 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageTrevor Bauer • 16 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Trevor Bauer

98%flagged-word coverage
531 attributed words87% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.6 ptsWriter: 10.6%Trevor Bauer: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.8 ptsWriter: 6.3%Trevor Bauer: 1.5%1.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.