Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,301 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dont At Me With Dan Dakich results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 972 hits . Analysis detected 6,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,645 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 50% (19,102 of 37,536 keywords). This Dont At Me With Dan Dakich is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group. Dont At Me With Dan Dakich
Keyword details
Total words: 6,645
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst