Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Trends results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,959 hits. Analysis detected 11,516 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,303 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Trends is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,303
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 21.1%21.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.9%12.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 21.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos