Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video345 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trees For Troops results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 55.5% saturation with 574 hits. Analysis detected 2,510 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,035 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (524 of 16,562 topics). This Trees For Troops is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group.
Trees For Troops
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,035
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

97% percentile
025507510096.8% percentile
15.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 49.5%49.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 55.5%55.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 29.9%29.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 28.7%28.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 15.7%15.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Topic 55.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 49.5%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 29.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos