Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trees results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 668 hits. Analysis detected 5,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,555 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,171 of 16,562 topics). This Trees is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Trees
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.7%1.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Special Pleading: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos