Topic summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tree Management results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 1,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,355 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (8,807 of 16,562 topics). This Tree Management is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Tree Management
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠47%Tree Management (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,355
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510046.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.6%4.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 18.1%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos