Topic summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Treason results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 1,040 hits. Analysis detected 6,637 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,155 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (10,683 of 15,690 topics). This Treason is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Treason
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 8,155
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.8%12.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.2%8.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Burden of Proof: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.4%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate