Topic summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video1,326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Travel And Well Being results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 1,742 hits. Analysis detected 8,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,630 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (6,829 of 16,562 topics). This Travel And Well Being is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Travel And Well Being
Topic details
Total words: 6,630
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 26.3%26.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 8.6%8.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 26.3%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 9.3%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Composition/Division: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos