Topic summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trauma Informed Care results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 666 hits. Analysis detected 4,731 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,659 of 15,487 topics). This Trauma Informed Care is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Trauma Informed Care
Topic details
Total words: 5,868
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos